Combined Eviction Notices Can Cause Problems

California law requires eviction notices (called “notices to quit”) to unambiguously terminate tenancy upon expiration of a time period specified in the notice. These periods can vary based on the type of tenancy. For example, an owner after foreclosure may be evicted with a 3-day notice to quit. However, if the property also has a renter under a bona fide lease, that occupant may necessitate a 90-day notice to quit to that occupant (under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1161c and the Federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act). Many eviction practitioners have developed “combined” notices to quit that are meant to be a catch all for anyone in the property (e.g. a combined 3-day and 90-day notice). Furthermore, some of the 90-day notices have requirements that any occupants who claim a tenancy under a bona fide lease provide evidence of the lease to the evicting party.

Trial courts have been striking down such combined notices, finding that these type of notices are uncertain and confusing because they reference several timeframes and failed to unambiguously terminate tenancy at a particular time. (See, e.g. E Trade Bank vs Joe Salter et al., Santa Barbara County Superior Court Case No. 1372298 [demurrer sustained on grounds that combined 3-day/90-day notice with requirement to provide proof of bona fide lease is ineffective notice].)

Accordingly, it is very important for the owner after a foreclosure to determine the best they can who is in the property. Separate, and very clear eviction notices must be drafted and directed to particular identified occupants at the property. Failure to do so may result in successful challenges to the eviction, and unnecessary delays in obtaining the final eviction.

Spiwak & Iezza can assist with complicated evictions to minimize challenges, and to expedite the final eviction. Please give us a call to discuss any eviction questions you may have.

 

***Disclaimer: This page has been prepared by Spiwak & Iezza, LLP for informational and educational purposes only. The content is intended to provide a general overview of the law and does not constitute specific legal advice. Viewing this page or using this site does not establish an attorney-client relationship with Spiwak & Iezza, LLP or any of its members. Additionally, because laws are subject to frequent changes, some of the information provided may no longer be current or applicable.



'
Privacy Overview
Spiwak and Iezza condensed logo

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.